Continue Learning about Lincoln Planning
I propose that we create a new Lincoln Planning Advisory group and recruit individuals from different neighborhoods around town. The Planning Board and Planning director would collectively educate this group on the Zoning by-law and on pros/cons of various issues currently in discussion. Members would bring their own ideas and work to collect the feedback from residents in their neighborhoods. Recruiting and retention would likely be a huge challenge but given the important issues surely to come up over the next 5 to 10 years, it's important to work hard to establish this group.
As a key part of outreach, the Planning Board should sponsor a monthly printed newsletter on any highlights in Planning over the past month and upcoming events or hearings for the following months. This would reach a broader audience and encourage more participation in our town planning processes.
Portions of the Lincoln Mall's 4 acres clearly need to be redeveloped. The older buildings are tired and the space is not well utilized. I believe there is a win-win-win option for the RLF, town, and new residents which involves ecosystem restoration, right-sized retail and new housing development. We should not settle for a developer who looks to maximize their profit and we should upgrade our site guidelines to reflect that.
In 1955, our Zoning By-law was amended to state that any lot under 80K sq ft is “non-conforming”. Lots smaller than that amount require homeowners to go to the Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) for alterations to their property. I would like to study how to alter the Zoning by-law to simplify the process for houses on non-conforming lots. Perhaps accessory structures, alterations and additions up to a certain % of the current sq footage could be allowed with only a registration rather than ZBA review/approval.
I very much support Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs), allowing a homeowner to create an additional unit out of their existing structures or in new structures on their property. This provides affordable housing in a distributed manner throughout town. There will be provision for 1200 sq ft Accessory Apartments AND the new state mandated 900 sq ft Accessory Dwelling Units "by right". We are required to remove the cap on the number of units however given the limited production of these units over the past 5 years in Lincoln, we are not a high risk of being overrun by this type of housing.
I believe our town should dedicate more financial resources to establish a baseline on key metrics (e.g. wait times, queue lengths) on all of major cut-through roads and then use predictive modeling to determine the likely impact of any new development on any of our major roads. We should not settle for the basic traffic study that a developer does which focuses solely on the impact to the specific road where the parcel is. For those that live on our major roads or major road adjacent, I ask you to join me to demand both baseline studies and more thorough impact studies for any new development, lowering speed limits on our major roads and requesting stricter enforcement of those speed limits . If you live in a subdivision or side street, I ask that you be sensitive to those that live on our major cut-through roads.
The crisis in housing in Eastern Massachusetts is not just a question of supply, it's also a question of the type of units available on the market. I'm not convinced that adding luxury units of a certain style will do enough to lower rents in Eastern Massachusetts. By identifying parcels with lower land acquisition costs and requiring a higher % of units be affordable from developers, we will be able to increase our stock of affordable housing in Lincoln and avoid luxury McCondo-land USA from invading Lincoln Station. Up to 21 Oriole Landing sized, luxury buildings (see rent prices below) could theoretically be built in the Lincoln Station area "by right" by a developer under the current Zoning bylaw
This is what happens when large corporate developers are free to create luxury Condo buildings "by right". I don't believe this is the right solution for Lincoln
Although it is illegal in Massachusetts to outright limit the size of single family homes, I would like to study ways through Zoning Bylaw to encourage new development to limit home sizes in order help protect the environment and reduce Lincoln's resource consumption. While a 10,000 sq ft house might be good for town finances, on balance I don't think it is good for Lincoln. Townhomes are a good compromise balancing the space required for families with the environmental benefits of shared walls.
The MBTA Communities Act is a law that was passed by our Commonwealth with bi-partisan support and we as a town have agreed to a specific design which re-zones parcels in broad swaths all around Lincoln Station. Remember, only 20% of the units were required to be near Lincoln station according to the law. I believe, had we taken more time, we could have come up with a better, more creative plan that would have prioritized our current residents while still supporting modest growth to help ease the housing crisis. I would be interested in making modifications to our plan that still meets the law's requirements however better balances the needs of our current residents with the needs of future residents. I recognize that this would take time, perhaps 2-3 years to be re-planned. Again, the town would have to be willing to commit some limited budget to these activities.
The so-called "snob-zoning". I believe these were put in place in the 1950s primarily to protect Lincoln against suburban sprawl and to protect our farmland. Along with our conservation land and our schools, I believe this feeling of openness is what attracted most of us to Lincoln in the first place. However, I would like to study reducing this minimum in some new zone(s) to encourage limited townhouse development (e.g. 4-5 units per acre). I believe townhouses (e.g. Farrar Pond Village) are a style we should encourage over condominium style buildings (e.g. Oriole Landing).